# PipraPay vs Prysm

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PipraPay | Prysm |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 65/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 9 in Fintech | #2 of 18 in Blockchain |
| GitHub stars | 325 | 3 790 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +6 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.0.0 · 24 May 2026 | v7.3.1 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Prysm scores 65/100 against 44/100 for PipraPay, so it is the safer default.

Prysm ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for PipraPay.

If you want the quickest setup, PipraPay is easier to run; Prysm needs more configuration.

Prysm is growing faster right now (+6 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PipraPay](https://selfhost.directory/project/piprapay) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/piprapay.md)
- [Prysm](https://selfhost.directory/project/prysm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/prysm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/piprapay-vs-prysm