# Pipes vs ReadMeABook

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Pipes | ReadMeABook |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #52 of 85 in Feed Reader | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 282 | 1 034 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +64 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 21 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

ReadMeABook scores 64/100 against 44/100 for Pipes, so it is the safer default.

ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Pipes.

ReadMeABook is growing faster right now (+64 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Pipes](https://selfhost.directory/project/pipes) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pipes.md)
- [ReadMeABook](https://selfhost.directory/project/readmeabook) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/readmeabook.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pipes-vs-readmeabook