# Pipes vs Reactive Resume

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Pipes | Reactive Resume |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #52 of 85 in Feed Reader | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 282 | 45 045 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 644 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 44/100 for Pipes, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Pipes.

If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; Pipes needs more configuration.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 644 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Pipes](https://selfhost.directory/project/pipes) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pipes.md)
- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pipes-vs-reactive-resume