# piped vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | piped | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 36 in Video Streaming | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 10 296 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +39 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Vue | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

piped scores 70/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for piped.

If you want the quickest setup, piped is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

piped is growing faster right now (+39 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [piped](https://selfhost.directory/project/piped) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/piped.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/piped-vs-windows-arm