# piped vs SyncWatch同步观影

> Two self-hosted [Video Streaming projects](https://selfhost.directory/video-streaming), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | piped | SyncWatch同步观影 |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 36 in Video Streaming | #24 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 10 295 ✓ | 141 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +37 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.4.4 · 6 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Vue | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

piped scores 70/100 against 46/100 for SyncWatch同步观影, so it is the safer default.

SyncWatch同步观影 ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for piped.

piped is growing faster right now (+37 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [piped](https://selfhost.directory/project/piped) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/piped.md)
- [SyncWatch同步观影](https://selfhost.directory/project/syncwatch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/syncwatch.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/piped-vs-syncwatch