# Apache Pinot vs Stirling-PDF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Apache Pinot | Stirling-PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 33/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 7 in Databases & storage | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 6 169 | 95 319 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 357 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 25 ✓ |
| Latest release | release-1.6.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | — | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 33/100 for Apache Pinot, so it is the safer default.

Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Apache Pinot.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 357 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Apache Pinot](https://selfhost.directory/project/pinot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pinot.md)
- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pinot-vs-stirling-pdf