# PineDocs vs scanopy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PineDocs | scanopy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 2 in Documentation Management | #1 of 10 in Network |
| GitHub stars | 142 | 5 915 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +121 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 40 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.19.3 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

scanopy scores 64/100 against 43/100 for PineDocs, so it is the safer default.

scanopy ships more often: 40 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for PineDocs.

If you want the quickest setup, PineDocs is easier to run; scanopy needs more configuration.

scanopy is growing faster right now (+121 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PineDocs](https://selfhost.directory/project/pinedocs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pinedocs.md)
- [scanopy](https://selfhost.directory/project/scanopy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scanopy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pinedocs-vs-scanopy