# Pinchflat vs WindowsinDocker

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Pinchflat | WindowsinDocker |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #13 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 5 430 | 53 714 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +62 | +329 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Elixir | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 65/100 for Pinchflat, so it is the safer default.

WindowsinDocker ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Pinchflat.

If you want the quickest setup, Pinchflat is easier to run; WindowsinDocker needs more configuration.

WindowsinDocker is growing faster right now (+329 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Pinchflat](https://selfhost.directory/project/pinchflat) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pinchflat.md)
- [WindowsinDocker](https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pinchflat-vs-windowsindocker