# Pinchflat vs Reactive Resume

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Pinchflat | Reactive Resume |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #13 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 431 | 45 012 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +61 | +1 611 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 34 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Elixir | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 65/100 for Pinchflat, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Pinchflat.

If you want the quickest setup, Pinchflat is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 611 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Pinchflat](https://selfhost.directory/project/pinchflat) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pinchflat.md)
- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pinchflat-vs-reactive-resume