# Pimcore vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Pimcore | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 18 in Content Management | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 3 883 | 93 040 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +28 | +1 246 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 ✓ | 19 |
| Latest release | v2026.3.3.1 · 22 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 61/100 for Pimcore, so it is the safer default.

Pimcore ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for uptime-kuma.

If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; Pimcore needs more configuration.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 246 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Pimcore](https://selfhost.directory/project/pimcore) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pimcore.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pimcore-vs-uptime-kuma