# Pimcore vs Reactive Resume

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Pimcore | Reactive Resume |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 18 in Content Management | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 3 883 | 45 030 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +28 | +1 629 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 ✓ | 34 |
| Latest release | v2026.3.3.1 · 22 Oct 2026 | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 61/100 for Pimcore, so it is the safer default.

Pimcore ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 34 for Reactive Resume.

If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; Pimcore needs more configuration.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 629 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Pimcore](https://selfhost.directory/project/pimcore) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pimcore.md)
- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pimcore-vs-reactive-resume