pikvmvsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| pikvm | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 23 in Remote Access | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 10 424 | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +66 | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 |
| Latest release | — | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | — | Python |
Which one should you pick?
pikvm and Tube Archivist score the same (72/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
Tube Archivist ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for pikvm.
pikvm details →Tube Archivist details →
Swap a project
Keep pikvm, compare it with
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with