# Piik vs wraft

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Piik | wraft |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in Live Streaming | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 3 871 ✓ | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +413 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Elixir |

## Which one should you pick?

Piik scores 73/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.

Piik ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for wraft.

If you want the quickest setup, Piik is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.

Piik is growing faster right now (+413 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Piik](https://selfhost.directory/project/piik) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/piik.md)
- [wraft](https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/piik-vs-wraft