# Piik vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Piik | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in Live Streaming | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 3 865 ✓ | 1 719 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +407 ✓ | +7 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Piik scores 73/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

Piik ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

If you want the quickest setup, Piik is easier to run; UUSEC WAF needs more configuration.

Piik is growing faster right now (+407 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Piik](https://selfhost.directory/project/piik) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/piik.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/piik-vs-uusec-waf