# Piik vs uMap

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Piik | uMap |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in Live Streaming | #3 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 3 859 ✓ | 1 628 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +401 ✓ | +25 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | 3.8.1 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Piik scores 73/100 against 64/100 for uMap, so it is the safer default.

Piik ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for uMap.

If you want the quickest setup, Piik is easier to run; uMap needs more configuration.

Piik is growing faster right now (+401 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Piik](https://selfhost.directory/project/piik) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/piik.md)
- [uMap](https://selfhost.directory/project/umap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/piik-vs-umap