# Piik vs SeaweedFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Piik | SeaweedFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in Live Streaming | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 3 859 | 35 793 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +401 | +868 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 28 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 73/100 for Piik, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for Piik.

If you want the quickest setup, Piik is easier to run; SeaweedFS needs more configuration.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+868 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Piik](https://selfhost.directory/project/piik) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/piik.md)
- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/piik-vs-seaweedfs