PiikvsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Piik | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in Live Streaming | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 3 859 | 35 793 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +401 | +868 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 28 |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 73/100 for Piik, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for Piik.
If you want the quickest setup, Piik is easier to run; SeaweedFS needs more configuration.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+868 stars in 30 days).
Piik details →SeaweedFS details →