# Piik vs scm-manager

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Piik | scm-manager |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in Live Streaming | #10 of 14 in Code Hosting |
| GitHub stars | 3 886 ✓ | 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +428 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | 3.11.4 · 11 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Piik scores 73/100 against 53/100 for scm-manager, so it is the safer default.

Piik ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for scm-manager.

If you want the quickest setup, Piik is easier to run; scm-manager needs more configuration.

Piik is growing faster right now (+428 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Piik](https://selfhost.directory/project/piik) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/piik.md)
- [scm-manager](https://selfhost.directory/project/scm-manager) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scm-manager.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/piik-vs-scm-manager