PiikvsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Piik | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in Live Streaming | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 3 859 | 44 998 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +401 | +1 625 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 34 |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 73/100 for Piik, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for Piik.
If you want the quickest setup, Piik is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 625 stars in 30 days).
Piik details →Reactive Resume details →