# Piik vs qm-music

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Piik | qm-music |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in Live Streaming | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 3 865 ✓ | 588 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +407 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Piik scores 73/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.

Piik ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for qm-music.

Piik is growing faster right now (+407 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Piik](https://selfhost.directory/project/piik) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/piik.md)
- [qm-music](https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/piik-vs-qm-music