# Piik vs QFieldCloud

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Piik | QFieldCloud |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in Live Streaming | #4 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 3 878 ✓ | 246 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +420 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v2.5.0 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v26.29 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Piik scores 73/100 against 54/100 for QFieldCloud, so it is the safer default.

Piik ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for QFieldCloud.

If you want the quickest setup, Piik is easier to run; QFieldCloud needs more configuration.

Piik is growing faster right now (+420 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Piik](https://selfhost.directory/project/piik) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/piik.md)
- [QFieldCloud](https://selfhost.directory/project/qfieldcloud) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qfieldcloud.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/piik-vs-qfieldcloud