# pidoors vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | pidoors | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 36/100 | 61/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #69 of 78 in Security | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 26 | 2 260 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.4.11 · 12 Sept 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | — | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 36/100 for pidoors, so it is the safer default.

pidoors ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

## Details

- [pidoors](https://selfhost.directory/project/pidoors) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pidoors.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pidoors-vs-windows-arm