# piclaw vs Reactive Resume

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | piclaw | Reactive Resume |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #26 of 120 in AI Assistant | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 886 | 45 067 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +1 666 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.3.4 · 15 Oct 2026 | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 53/100 for piclaw, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 27 for piclaw.

If you want the quickest setup, piclaw is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 666 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [piclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/piclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/piclaw.md)
- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/piclaw-vs-reactive-resume