# PicImpact vs Vert

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PicImpact | Vert |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 71/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #14 of 41 in Photo Management | #2 of 10 in File Conversion |
| GitHub stars | 1 315 | 16 174 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +541 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.3.8 · 23 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Vert scores 71/100 against 57/100 for PicImpact, so it is the safer default.

PicImpact ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Vert.

If you want the quickest setup, Vert is easier to run; PicImpact needs more configuration.

Vert is growing faster right now (+541 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PicImpact](https://selfhost.directory/project/picimpact) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/picimpact.md)
- [Vert](https://selfhost.directory/project/vert) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/vert.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/picimpact-vs-vert