PicImpactvsApache Tika
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PicImpact | Apache Tika | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 41 in Photo Management | #1 of 2 in Data Extraction |
| GitHub stars | 1 315 | 4 115 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.3.8 · 23 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Apache Tika scores 68/100 against 57/100 for PicImpact, so it is the safer default.
PicImpact ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Tika.
Apache Tika is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).
PicImpact details →Apache Tika details →
Swap a project
Keep PicImpact, compare it with
Keep Apache Tika, compare it with