PicImpactvsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PicImpact | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 41 in Photo Management | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 315 | 45 030 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 629 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 34 |
| Latest release | v3.3.8 · 23 Sept 2026 | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 57/100 for PicImpact, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for PicImpact.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 629 stars in 30 days).
PicImpact details →Reactive Resume details →
Swap a project
Keep PicImpact, compare it with
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with