# PicImpact vs Project N.O.M.A.D.

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PicImpact | Project N.O.M.A.D. |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #14 of 41 in Photo Management | #1 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 315 | 41 202 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 851 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v3.3.8 · 23 Sept 2026 | v1.35.1 · 5 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Project N.O.M.A.D. scores 85/100 against 57/100 for PicImpact, so it is the safer default.

PicImpact ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Project N.O.M.A.D..

Project N.O.M.A.D. is growing faster right now (+2 851 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PicImpact](https://selfhost.directory/project/picimpact) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/picimpact.md)
- [Project N.O.M.A.D.](https://selfhost.directory/project/project-n-o-m-a-d) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/project-n-o-m-a-d.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/picimpact-vs-project-n-o-m-a-d