# pi-timolo vs supabase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | pi-timolo | supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 92/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #16 of 36 in Video Streaming | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 579 | 114 295 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 547 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 51/100 for pi-timolo, so it is the safer default.

supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for pi-timolo.

If you want the quickest setup, pi-timolo is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.

supabase is growing faster right now (+3 547 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [pi-timolo](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-timolo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-timolo.md)
- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pi-timolo-vs-supabase