# Pi Pocket vs Reactive Resume

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Pi Pocket | Reactive Resume |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #40 of 120 in AI Assistant | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 712 | 45 072 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 671 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.26.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 50/100 for Pi Pocket, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Pi Pocket.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 671 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Pi Pocket](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-pocket) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-pocket.md)
- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pi-pocket-vs-reactive-resume