Pi-holevsZero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Pi-hole | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in DNS | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 61 536 | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +492 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 9 |
| Latest release | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Shell | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.
Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Pi-hole.
If you want the quickest setup, Pi-hole is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.
Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+492 stars in 30 days).
Pi-hole details →Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes details →
Swap a project
Keep Pi-hole, compare it with
Keep Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, compare it with