Pi-holevsWeb Rendering Proxy (WRP)
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Pi-hole | Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in DNS | #11 of 25 in Proxy |
| GitHub stars | 61 541 | 1 306 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +497 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 4 |
| Latest release | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | 4.10.3 · 23 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 53/100 for Web Rendering Proxy (WRP), so it is the safer default.
Pi-hole ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Web Rendering Proxy (WRP).
If you want the quickest setup, Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) is easier to run; Pi-hole needs more configuration.
Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+497 stars in 30 days).
Pi-hole details →Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) details →
Swap a project
Keep Pi-hole, compare it with
Keep Web Rendering Proxy (WRP), compare it with