# Pi-hole vs wraft

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Pi-hole | wraft |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in DNS | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 61 548 ✓ | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +486 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Elixir |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.

Pi-hole ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for wraft.

If you want the quickest setup, Pi-hole is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.

Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+486 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)
- [wraft](https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pi-hole-vs-wraft