# Pi-hole vs WPS Office

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Pi-hole | WPS Office |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in DNS | #6 of 6 in Office Suites |
| GitHub stars | 61 550 ✓ | 196 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +488 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 21 ✓ |
| Latest release | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | 11.1.0.11723-2-ls194 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Dockerfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 52/100 for WPS Office, so it is the safer default.

WPS Office ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Pi-hole.

Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+488 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)
- [WPS Office](https://selfhost.directory/project/wps-office) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wps-office.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pi-hole-vs-wps-office