# Pi-hole vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Pi-hole | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in DNS | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 61 536 ✓ | 8 650 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +492 ✓ | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.

Pi-hole ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; Pi-hole needs more configuration.

Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+492 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pi-hole-vs-workout-cool