# Pi-hole vs woodpecker-ci

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Pi-hole | woodpecker-ci |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in DNS | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 61 536 ✓ | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +492 ✓ | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.

woodpecker-ci ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Pi-hole.

Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+492 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)
- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pi-hole-vs-woodpecker-ci