Pi-holevswikmd
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Pi-hole | wikmd | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in DNS | #5 of 8 in Documentation Management |
| GitHub stars | 61 546 | 423 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +484 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 1 |
| Latest release | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | v1.10.7 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 45/100 for wikmd, so it is the safer default.
Pi-hole ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for wikmd.
If you want the quickest setup, wikmd is easier to run; Pi-hole needs more configuration.
Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+484 stars in 30 days).
Pi-hole details →wikmd details →
Swap a project
Keep Pi-hole, compare it with
Keep wikmd, compare it with