# Pi-hole vs WebCodex

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Pi-hole | WebCodex |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in DNS | #60 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 61 546 ✓ | 2 451 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +484 ✓ | +3 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 7 ✓ |
| Latest release | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.4.6 · 4 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 55/100 for WebCodex, so it is the safer default.

WebCodex ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Pi-hole.

Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+484 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)
- [WebCodex](https://selfhost.directory/project/webcodex) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/webcodex.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pi-hole-vs-webcodex