# Pi-hole vs voidaccess

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Pi-hole | voidaccess |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in DNS | #28 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 61 536 ✓ | 948 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +492 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | v2.1.0 · 18 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 57/100 for voidaccess, so it is the safer default.

voidaccess ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Pi-hole.

If you want the quickest setup, Pi-hole is easier to run; voidaccess needs more configuration.

Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+492 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)
- [voidaccess](https://selfhost.directory/project/voidaccess) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/voidaccess.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pi-hole-vs-voidaccess