# Pi-hole vs uncompressed

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Pi-hole | uncompressed |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in DNS | #71 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 61 546 ✓ | 213 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +484 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.0.0 · 4 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 47/100 for uncompressed, so it is the safer default.

Pi-hole ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for uncompressed.

If you want the quickest setup, Pi-hole is easier to run; uncompressed needs more configuration.

Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+484 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)
- [uncompressed](https://selfhost.directory/project/uncompressed) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uncompressed.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pi-hole-vs-uncompressed