# Pi-hole vs Umami

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Pi-hole | Umami |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in DNS | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 61 541 ✓ | 39 753 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +497 | +772 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 85/100 for Umami, so it is the safer default.

Umami ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Pi-hole.

If you want the quickest setup, Umami is easier to run; Pi-hole needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)
- [Umami](https://selfhost.directory/project/umami) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umami.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pi-hole-vs-umami