# Pi-hole vs Ultimate Certificate Manager

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Pi-hole | Ultimate Certificate Manager |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in DNS | #4 of 8 in Certificate Management |
| GitHub stars | 61 544 ✓ | 170 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +482 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | v2.246 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 50/100 for Ultimate Certificate Manager, so it is the safer default.

Pi-hole ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Ultimate Certificate Manager.

Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+482 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)
- [Ultimate Certificate Manager](https://selfhost.directory/project/ultimate-ca-manager) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ultimate-ca-manager.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pi-hole-vs-ultimate-ca-manager