# Pi-hole vs UglyFeed

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Pi-hole | UglyFeed |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in DNS | #52 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 61 556 ✓ | 323 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +494 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.0.52 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 44/100 for UglyFeed, so it is the safer default.

Pi-hole ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for UglyFeed.

Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+494 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)
- [UglyFeed](https://selfhost.directory/project/uglyfeed) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uglyfeed.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pi-hole-vs-uglyfeed