# Pi-hole vs transfer.sh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Pi-hole | transfer.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in DNS | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 61 531 ✓ | 15 908 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +487 ✓ | +11 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.

Pi-hole ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.

If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; Pi-hole needs more configuration.

Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+487 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)
- [transfer.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pi-hole-vs-transfersh