Pi-holevstextsnap
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Pi-hole | textsnap | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in DNS | #8 of 12 in Document Processing |
| GitHub stars | 61 554 | 196 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +492 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 2 |
| Latest release | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | v0.4.0 · 29 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 45/100 for textsnap, so it is the safer default.
Pi-hole ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for textsnap.
If you want the quickest setup, textsnap is easier to run; Pi-hole needs more configuration.
Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+492 stars in 30 days).
Pi-hole details →textsnap details →
Swap a project
Keep Pi-hole, compare it with
Keep textsnap, compare it with