# Pi-hole vs SyncWatch同步观影

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Pi-hole | SyncWatch同步观影 |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in DNS | #24 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 61 546 ✓ | 140 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +484 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.4.4 · 6 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 46/100 for SyncWatch同步观影, so it is the safer default.

SyncWatch同步观影 ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Pi-hole.

Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+484 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)
- [SyncWatch同步观影](https://selfhost.directory/project/syncwatch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/syncwatch.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pi-hole-vs-syncwatch