Pi-holevssuperlog
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Pi-hole | superlog | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in DNS | #53 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 61 550 | 1 477 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +488 | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 0 |
| Latest release | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 54/100 for superlog, so it is the safer default.
Pi-hole ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for superlog.
If you want the quickest setup, Pi-hole is easier to run; superlog needs more configuration.
Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+488 stars in 30 days).
Pi-hole details →superlog details →
Swap a project
Keep Pi-hole, compare it with
Keep superlog, compare it with