# Pi-hole vs Scada-LTS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Pi-hole | Scada-LTS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in DNS | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 61 541 ✓ | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +497 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.

Pi-hole ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.

Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+497 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)
- [Scada-LTS](https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pi-hole-vs-scada-lts