# Pi-hole vs RemoteTerm for MeshCore

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Pi-hole | RemoteTerm for MeshCore |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in DNS | #4 of 4 in Amateur Radio |
| GitHub stars | 61 545 ✓ | 337 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +483 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ | 3.17.1 · 26 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 45/100 for RemoteTerm for MeshCore, so it is the safer default.

RemoteTerm for MeshCore ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Pi-hole.

If you want the quickest setup, Pi-hole is easier to run; RemoteTerm for MeshCore needs more configuration.

Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+483 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)
- [RemoteTerm for MeshCore](https://selfhost.directory/project/remote-terminal-for-meshcore) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/remote-terminal-for-meshcore.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pi-hole-vs-remote-terminal-for-meshcore