Pi-holevsRemoteTerm for MeshCore
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Pi-hole | RemoteTerm for MeshCore | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in DNS | #4 of 4 in Amateur Radio |
| GitHub stars | 61 545 | 337 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +483 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 10 |
| Latest release | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | 3.17.1 · 26 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 45/100 for RemoteTerm for MeshCore, so it is the safer default.
RemoteTerm for MeshCore ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Pi-hole.
If you want the quickest setup, Pi-hole is easier to run; RemoteTerm for MeshCore needs more configuration.
Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+483 stars in 30 days).
Pi-hole details →RemoteTerm for MeshCore details →
Swap a project
Keep Pi-hole, compare it with
Keep RemoteTerm for MeshCore, compare it with