Pi-holevsReadMeABook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Pi-hole | ReadMeABook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in DNS | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 61 535 | 1 033 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +491 | +65 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 21 |
| Latest release | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 64/100 for ReadMeABook, so it is the safer default.
ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Pi-hole.
If you want the quickest setup, Pi-hole is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.
Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+491 stars in 30 days).
Pi-hole details →ReadMeABook details →
Swap a project
Keep Pi-hole, compare it with
Keep ReadMeABook, compare it with